Gavel and scales of justice on a desk, with a rideshare vehicle blurred in the background
Rideshare Accident Attorney
Lawyers States Cities Methodology Blog About Contact
Find an attorney
Independent research · Not a law firm

Find the best rideshare accident lawyer, researched, not advertised.

We independently research, verify, and compare the attorneys who handle Uber and Lyft cases across the United States — so you can decide with clarity, before you ever place a call.

12
Lawyers published
100%
Editorially reviewed
$0
Paid placements
Growing
Updated weekly
Coverage All 9 states →

Browse by state

Nine states checked so far. Each page sets out what that state’s register will and won’t stand behind.

California

Publishes a full status history — but removes some administrative suspensions from display under its own policy.

1 lawyer →
Texas

Gives its own disciplinary finding, then flags the rest of the page as self-reported by the lawyer.

2 lawyers →
Florida

Authoritative, but publishes ten years only — which showed us 18% of a 55-year career.

2 lawyers →
New York

Vouches for one line: registration status. Sends you to the Appellate Division for discipline.

1 lawyer →
Illinois

The most forthcoming register we use. Prints “None” affirmatively — and prints the censure when there is one.

2 lawyers →
Arizona

Prints “None” and records liability insurance, while stating it does not display all public sanctions.

1 lawyer →
Nevada

Prints “None”. Issues bar numbers in sequence — ours holds #505. Fuller certificate on request.

1 lawyer →
Georgia

Publishes from 1991, so it covers whole careers — but warns a reinstated lawyer can read as “in Good Standing”.

1 lawyer →
Washington

The only one of the nine that never says “none”. Shows a blank, and warns its search may miss things.

1 lawyer →
Major Markets

Popular rideshare cities

The markets we’ve checked so far. Every lawyer looked up by hand in their own state’s bar register.

Los Angeles
California
1
lawyer
9 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Houston
Texas
1
lawyer
23 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Chicago
Illinois
2
lawyers
14–32 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Miami
Florida
2
lawyers
43–55 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Dallas
Texas
1
lawyer
23 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Phoenix
Arizona
1
lawyer
19 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Las Vegas
Nevada
1
lawyer
45 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Atlanta
Georgia
1
lawyer
32 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Seattle
Washington
1
lawyer
25 yrs
at the bar
See what we found →
Adoption and ride-volume figures are estimates for illustrative purposes, not measured or audited data.
Why trust our research

Law firms promote themselves. We compare everyone.

We take no payment for placement and hold no client relationships. Our only job is to help you decide well.

I

Editorial independence

No attorney pays for a listing, a rank, or a badge. Placement can't be bought.

II

Manual research

Each listing is researched and screened one at a time, never bulk-imported.

III

Lead-generation screening

We reject multi-city listings that share a call centre and trade as local firms.

IV

Regular updates

Profiles are corrected as facts change. Anything unconfirmed says so on the card.

V

Transparent methodology

Our full process is published and open for anyone to scrutinize.

Our Methodology Full methodology →

How a profile gets published

I
Shortlist
Compile candidates market by market, from public sources rather than paid placement.
II
Screening
Reject lead-generation networks, shared call centres and referral brokers. We screened about forty firms to list twelve.
III
Bar check
Look every lawyer up by hand in their own state’s register — licence number, status, admission date, disciplinary history. Nine states, nine different answers.
IV
Provenance labelling
Every claim tagged verified, firm-reported, or not established. A dashed border means we don’t have it.
V
Publishing
Live in a consistent format — including a plain statement of what the register would not tell us.
Data Points

What we check — and what we won’t

Every fact on this site sits in one of three tiers. We would rather print an empty box than a number we cannot stand behind — which is why some of these listings are visibly incomplete.

✓ Verified
Read by hand from the state’s own register, on 16 July 2026.
Bar number, status and eligibility
Admission date — and the years since
Disciplinary history, where the state prints it
Malpractice insurance, where recorded
● Firm-reported
Their words, published as theirs and labelled that way.
Fee terms and free consultations
Practice areas and rideshare focus
Languages, offices and awards
Every settlement figure they publish
○ Not established
Nobody has told us — so we print a dashed border and say so.
What a settlement figure meant in court
Which listed offices are staffed
Registers in the other states they claim
Grievances — confidential in all nine states
Blog

Two numbers nobody publishes

We went looking for the two most basic figures in this industry and could not get a straight answer to either. Both pieces are about why.

01 26 sources · 7 min
How many Uber drivers are there? By country.
What we found
No ranked table is possible. Uber reports drivers and couriers as a single bundled figure, so no country total can be pulled out of it. The one per-country number its CEO has given is Brazil — roughly 1.4 million, and Uber’s largest market on earth. Not the United States.
Read the piece →
02 16 sources · 7 min
How many Lyft drivers are there?
What we found
The SEC asked Lyft to disclose a driver count. Lyft formally declined, and the SEC let it go. Lyft’s own S-1 shows the number swinging by a factor of 1.7 on nothing but the choice of time window — which is why we print no ride volumes anywhere on this site.
Read the piece →

That is the whole list. We have published two statistics pieces, and we are not going to pad this section with links to articles we have not written.

Questions

Common questions, answered plainly.

No. We are an independent editorial platform. We don't provide legal services or represent clients — we research and compare attorneys so you can choose one yourself.
No. There are no paid placements, sponsored ranks, or purchased badges. That independence is the whole point of what we do.
Twelve are published today across nine states, and every single one has been looked up by hand in that state's own register. We screened roughly forty firms to get there and rejected the rest, mostly multi-city lead-generation listings. We are a new project and expand market by market rather than padding the count.
We look up each lawyer by hand in their state's own bar register and publish what it says, with the date we checked it. All six lawyers featured here are done, across all six states we cover. Two of the eight people we've checked turned up disciplinary records — a censure and a suspension — and both are reported in full on their profiles, because a check that only publishes good news isn't a check. We also confirm the office, the phone line and the review record, and we screen out lead-generation networks and referral brokers. What a bar check can't tell you is whether someone is any good, so we don't pretend otherwise.
No. Every review count on this site was read off Google on 16 July 2026 and is reported as a count, not a score we invented — 4.9 across 208 for Greening, 5.0 across 362 for Kelly, and so on. We publish no rating of our own. We also don’t think a review average tells you much: one firm we rejected had its reviews allege they were solicited days into cases.
No. Browsing profiles, guides, and comparisons is completely free for everyone.

Start with research, not a sales call.

Browse verified profiles by state or city, and compare on what actually matters for your case.

Browse by state Browse by city